Updated 4 days ago
When comparing Stack’s timed-release micropills with sublingual supplements, there are clear advantages to Stack’s approach in terms of nutrient delivery, absorption efficiency, and comfort.
Key Advantages of Stack’s Timed-Release Beads
-
Larger Nutrient Payload: Sublingual films dissolve just a few milligrams of nutrients, while Stack effectively delivers over 5 grams of vitamins and minerals, maximizing your nutrient intake.
-
Comprehensive Absorption: Many vitamins and minerals, especially fat-soluble vitamins like A, D, E, and K, do not absorb well sublingually. Minerals such as calcium and magnesium also require intestinal absorption. Additionally, vitamin B12 specifically needs to pass through the gut to combine with intrinsic factor for optimal absorption.
-
Prevents Mineral Interactions: Stack strategically separates minerals like calcium, iron, magnesium, and zinc by releasing them four hours apart, supporting absorption and reducing nutrient competition.
-
Steady Nutrient Levels: Stack’s micropills provide a steady nutrient release over 6–8 hours. In contrast, sublingual supplements often produce a brief spike followed by rapid urinary elimination.
-
Improved Tolerance: Gradual nutrient release directly into the intestine reduces the likelihood of nausea and other gastrointestinal discomforts.
Bottom Line
Stack’s timed-release beads provide a sustained, comprehensive nutrient delivery that outperforms sublingual supplements in payload capacity, absorption efficiency, sustained nutrient levels, and comfort.
Was this page helpful?
Need more help?
Contact Us